This week I attended the XIX International AIDS Conference on behalf of REPSSI (The Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative.) Based in Johannesburg, REPSSI trains "front-line" service providers on children's emotional and social well-being and works with governments and NGOs to develop child-friendly policy frameworks in 13 countries in southern & eastern Africa. There are at least 1,994 project sites where REPSSI approaches are being applied and five million children being supported by its partner network.
This is a guest post by Jennifer Lentfer of how-matters.org on the REPSSI (Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative) blog.
Growing up, my family life was not easy. My father drank and it weighed heavily on my mother, who did her best to maintain as much normalcy for me and my brothers as possible. Looking back, our home’s “culture of silence” was often the most difficult part for me to bear, more than the yelling or the financial stresses or the unpredictability of my father’s behavior. As a child I had so many overwhelming feelings inside of me that simply had no place to go.
The author, with her great grandmother, in the U.S. state of Nebraska, 1977.
Since the 1990s, the crisis of millions of children infected and affected by HIV in sub-Saharan Africa became well documented. It was during this period that I traveled abroad for the first time to Zimbabwe at the age of 19, hoping to get as far away from home as possible. I then went on to become an aid worker, and it is no wonder that I was drawn to children’s programming in sub-Saharan Africa. Even though I was from middle America, from another culture and upbringing, I knew what it was to feel that loneliness, shame, burden, and vulnerability.
Both scholarly literature and policy papers told us at the time that the extended family – the traditional source of support for African children without parental care – was the primary safety net of care for children infected and affected by HIV. It was understood, at least by some observers, that most children were getting by not because of sweeping national-level policy protections or major international programs. Rather, those who survived and thrived did so because of the local efforts of people who organized their communities to keep children in school, mobilize and assist foster parents, and provide psychosocial support for children grieving or caring for ill parents.
Building on Tradition
Assistance to children and families affected by AIDS and poverty within their immediate communities builds on long-standing African traditions of community-level sharing of agricultural labor, assistance in times of drought and other calamities, and shared child care, much like the rural, farming area where I grew up. In fact, across Africa, the poorest and most vulnerable people set up indigenous, resilient, and often informal coping mechanisms such as self-help groups, church groups, burial associations, grain loan schemes, and rotating credit and loan clubs (Lwihula & Over, 1995; Mutangadura et al., 2000, Wilkinson-Maposa et al., 2009). Most of these community initiatives grow out of the concern of a few motivated individuals who work together to support vulnerable children. They spring from a sense of people’s obligation and desire to care for those in need.
I know intimately that it is this sense of obligation that can give children the care they need to become healthy and happy adults. My own family did not exist in isolation either. The proverb “it takes a village to raise a child” was no cliché, but my lived experience. Even when things were hard, I now realize how much that love, care and protection existed around me and strengthened me.
Communities ARE “Turning the Tide”
According to a 2004 survey by the University of Kwazulu-Natal, there are at least 50,000 community-based organizations (CBOs) in the South African non-profit sector alone, which contradicts the dominant image in the aid and philanthropic sectors that services are mainly provided by formal and professionally-run NGOs. In Malawi a CBO mapping exercise identified over 1,800 CBOs focused on orphans and child protection (Network of Organizations for Vulnerable and Orphaned Children, 2005). A Ugandan study for the Joint Learning Initiative on Children in AIDS in 2007 revealed that the prevalence of community-level initiatives for children affected by HIV was one per 1,300 people. Most were independent groups or linked to local churches, schools, or clinics. While these figures may vary in other countries, there is evidence of many CBOs are assisting children needing protection by extending emotional support and social services into areas and communities that are often not sufficiently reached by government or international agencies.
Today with the support and love of family members, friends, and trained professionals, my family has done a lot of healing and I am so grateful for it. In its ten years since its founding, REPSSI has worked with over 100 non-profit organizations and government agencies in almost 2,000 projects across southern and east Africa so that every child has this same chance. There are 5 million children and their families and communities who I know are also grateful.
REPSSI will be celebrating its 10th anniversary throughout Africa this year and at the XIX International AIDS Conferencein Washington D.C. on July 21st. This year's conference theme is “Turning the Tide Together.”
The author wishes to thank Zanele Sibanda for her contributions to this article.
At the upcoming XIX International AIDS Conference here in Washington D.C., I'll be joining REPSSI (the Regional Psychosocial Support Initiative) as they celebrate their decade-long work to lessen the devastating social and emotional (psychosocial) impact of poverty, conflict, HIV and AIDS among children and youth across East and Southern Africa.
In preparation, I am re-reading this 2005 Save the Children UK publication, "Bottlenecks & drip-feeds: Channelling resources to communities responding to orphans and vulnerable children in Africa."
In it the author Dr. Geoff Foster argues that what stops the smooth flow of aid funds to support indigenous, community-level initiatives is:
1) Providing resources to communities is not taken seriously at global and national levels,
2) Current risk-averse funding mechanisms do not allow for resource ‘flows’ that reach community-based organizations, and
3) Donors and governments are not held accountable for spending to support community initiatives.
It leaves me wondering, in the seven years since this was written, how much has changed?
As community-based and -focused institutions, grassroots organizations are still part of the social fabric of the community in which girls and boys live and grow. They are still uniquely positioned to serve and be led by vulnerable, unreached, and marginalized children. Grassroots organizations are still most often the “first responders,” addressing children's and families' immediate and long-term needs. When election-related violence breaks out, an earthquake hits, or a case of abuse is discovered, grassroots organizations still snap into action to make sure kids are safe and cared for, demonstrating a resourcefulness and commitment to children that stems from their “staying power” at the local level.
This intimate position within girls’ and boys' lives and in the community enables grassroots organizations to (1) have the legitimacy and trust to reach marginalized and isolated children with supportive and appropriate care, (2) design programs that are deemed most necessary and sensible in their locality, and (3) use their expertise to influence local support systems and institutions (e.g. families, schools, etc.) to more adequately fulfill children’s rights.
This is why seven years later I still want to see more well-resourced mechanisms that reach under-funded grassroots organizations with unrestricted small grants. When it comes to children, these grassroots leaders are the real experts.
Among us 25,000+ "experts" who will be gathered in D.C. later this month, is our lack of humility what really stops the smooth flow of funds?
Organizations like REPSSI know how to break the bottleneck when it comes to funding for children--but are we listening?
This post originally appeared at: http://www.how-matters.org/2012/07/05/bottlenecks-and-dripfeeds/
This past week I read countless articles about the high rate of AIDS infection in Sub Saharan Africa and the increase in orphans due to the aids pandemic. What I find astounding is that out of the 22 million people living with AIDS and HIV, 12 million of those infected are women and 1.8 million are children (statistics taken from 2007 data).
In collaboration with
African Studies Department
"Projecting Change and Continuity Under the Obama Administration"
"Health and Life" or Santé et Vie ; Club and Association founded by students of Medical Sciences Institu of Setif - Algeria. Now, after 4 years of its establishment, Health and Life, with about fifty members: students in medicine, pharmacy and young doctors with a spirit enthusiastic, energetic ... for one purpose ... helping to improve ...
The major factor that will shape the future evolution of Africa is in the education and sensitisation of the people. A commonly cited example is the AIDs epidemic. Over 20 years after its outbreak, ignorance and stigma still surround the epidemic to the point where AIDs victims are unable to openly talk about their struggles for fear of discrimination or violence.
Two examples of mobile phones being used are the AJEDI-Ka/Projet Enfants Soldats which aims to monitor the rights violations and improve child protection in Eastern DRC" The project operates in 15 high risk villages in the Uvira region.
Learning about Living (LaL) is a Nigerian based project that uses mobile phones and computers to teach young people about HIV/AIDS prevention and sexuality. The project has three aims
* Utilise information and communication technology (ICT) to equip Nigerian teenagers with the relevant skills to enable them make informed decisions about their sexual health, prevent HIV/AIDS and gender based violence, and associated mortality and morbidity